Welcome to docker.ru hosting provider linux mirror located at Moscow, Russian Federation.
Server configuration: Linux with OpenZFS, 2 x E5-2670v2, 128 GB ECC memory, 12 x 4 TB raidz2 + 1 TB SSD for L2ARC.
Network: 20 gbps uplink, IPv4 (185.253.23.31), IPv6 (2a04:8580:ffff:fffe::2).
My hostname is mirror.docker.ru
While user access to administrative controls is an important issue for system administrators within an organization, keeping tabs on which network services are active is of paramount importance to anyone who administers and operates a Linux system.
Many services under Red Hat Enterprise Linux behave as network servers. If a network service is running on a machine, then a server application called a daemon is listening for connections on one or more network ports. Each of these servers should be treated as potential avenue of attack.
Network services can pose many risks for Linux systems. Below is a list of some of the primary issues:
Denial of Service Attacks (DoS) — By flooding a service with requests, a denial of service attack can bring a system to a screeching halt as it tries to log and answer each request.
Script Vulnerability Attacks — If a server is using scripts to execute server-side actions, as Web servers commonly do, a cracker can mount an attack on improperly written scripts. These script vulnerability attacks can lead to a buffer overflow condition or allow the attacker to alter files on the system.
Buffer Overflow Attacks — Services which connect to ports numbered 0 through 1023 must run as an administrative user. If the application has an exploitable buffer overflow, an attacker could gain access to the system as the user running the daemon. Because exploitable buffer overflows exist, crackers use automated tools to identify systems with vulnerabilities, and once they have gained access, they use automated rootkits to maintain their access to the system.
Note | |
---|---|
The threat of buffer overflow vulnerabilities is mitigated in Red Hat Enterprise Linux by ExecShield, an executable memory segmentation and protection technology supported by x86-compatible uni- and multi-processor kernels. ExecShield reduces the risk of buffer overflow by separating virtual memory into executable and non-executable segments. Any program code that tries to execute outside of the executable segment (such as malicious code injected from a buffer overflow exploit) triggers a segmentation fault and terminates. Execshield also includes support for No eXecute (NX) technology on AMD64 platforms and eXecute Disable (XD) technology on Itanium and Intel® EM64T systems. These technologies work in conjunction with ExecShield to prevent malicious code from running in the executable portion of virtual memory with a granularity of 4kb of executable code, lowering the risk of attack from stealthy buffer overflow exploits. For more information about ExecShield and NX or XD technologies, refer to the whitepaper entitled New Security Enhancements in Red Hat Enterprise Linux v.3, Update 3, available at the following URL: |
To limit exposure to attacks over the network, all services that are unused should be turned off.
To enhance security, most network services installed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux are turned off by default. There are, however, some notable exceptions:
cupsd — The default print server for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
lpd — An alternate print server.
xinetd — A super server that controls connections to a host of subordinate servers, such as vsftpd and telnet.
sendmail — The Sendmail mail transport agent is enabled by default, but only listens for connections from the localhost.
sshd — The OpenSSH server, which is a secure replacement for Telnet.
When determining whether to leave these services running, it is best to use common sense and err on the side of caution. For example, if a printer is not available, do not leave cupsd running. The same is true for portmap. If you do not mount NFSv3 volumes or use NIS (the ypbind service), then portmap should be disabled.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ships with three programs designed to switch services on or off. They are the Services Configuration Tool (system-config-services), ntsysv, and chkconfig. For information on using these tools, refer to the chapter titled Controlling Access to Services in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux System Administration Guide.
If unsure of the purpose for a particular service, the Services Configuration Tool has a description field, illustrated in Figure 4-3, that may be of some use.
But checking which network services are available to start at boot time is not enough. Good system administrators should also check which ports are open and listening. Refer to Section 5.8 Verifying Which Ports Are Listening for more on this subject.
Potentially, any network service is insecure. This is why turning unused services off is so important. Exploits for services are revealed and patched routinely, making it very important to keep packages associated with any network service updated. Refer to Chapter 3 Security Updates for more information about this issue.
Some network protocols are inherently more insecure than others. These include any services which do the following things:
Pass Usernames and Passwords Over a Network Unencrypted — Many older protocols, such as Telnet and FTP, do not encrypt the authentication session and should be avoided whenever possible.
Pass Sensitive Data Over a Network Unencrypted — Many protocols pass data over the network unencrypted. These protocols include Telnet, FTP, HTTP, and SMTP. Many network file systems, such as NFS and SMB, also pass information over the network unencrypted. It is the user's responsibility when using these protocols to limit what type of data is transmitted.
Also, remote memory dump services, like netdump, pass the contents of memory over the network unencrypted. Memory dumps can contain passwords or, even worse, database entries and other sensitive information.
Other services like finger and rwhod reveal information about users of the system.
Examples of inherently insecure services includes the following:
rlogin
rsh
telnet
vsftpd
All remote login and shell programs (rlogin, rsh, and telnet) should be avoided in favor of SSH. (refer to Section 4.7 Security Enhanced Communication Tools for more information about sshd.)
FTP is not as inherently dangerous to the security of the system as remote shells, but FTP servers must be carefully configured and monitored to avoid problems. Refer to Section 5.6 Securing FTP for more information on securing FTP servers.
Services which should be carefully implemented and behind a firewall include:
finger
identd
netdump
netdump-server
nfs
rwhod
sendmail
smb (Samba)
yppasswdd
ypserv
ypxfrd
More information on securing network services is available in Chapter 5 Server Security.
The next section discusses tools available to set up a simple firewall.